Unofficial KISS Linux community channel | https://kisscommunity.bvnf.space | post logs or else | song of the day https://yewtu.be/watch?v=S81bNIK4MaE |
---|
Earlier messages |
---|
| <midfavila> | i wanna rebuild the base image from source, then try to get a plain debian |
| <midfavila> | once i can do that i'll have the build down plus all the essentials from clockwork isolated |
| <midfavila> | after that gonna experiment with alpine |
| <midfavila> | if alpine can run, anything can |
| <midfavila> | that means a kiss image and then work starts on curses programs |
| <midfavila> | at some point id like to write a library that abstracts over xaw/curses/etc and just use that |
| <midfavila> | present a simplified interface for creating CUA programs for either toolkit |
| <sad_plan> | I was going to say alpine doesnt provide riscv rootfs's, or isos, but then I saw it |
| <sad_plan> | its only a mini rootfs though, not isos |
| <sad_plan> | but yes, if alpine runs, most other things should for sure run |
| <midfavila> | the build process for the r01 image calls for a rootfs only |
| <sad_plan> | why? is this a riscv thing or a uconsole thing or..? |
| <midfavila> | basically entails creating a raw disk image, partitioning and formatting it, injecting the spl and uboot into the first 32m, |
| <midfavila> | then installing grub (and syslinux???) onto the boot partition and pointing that at the rootfs |
| <midfavila> | its a uconsole thing i think |
| <sad_plan> | I see |
| <midfavila> | its weird |
| <sad_plan> | yeah |
| <midfavila> | they dont have good docs at all |
| <sad_plan> | hopefully itll come once riscv gets a better foothold |
| <midfavila> | it wont |
| <midfavila> | i think the r01 was intended mostly as a novelty |
| <midfavila> | which sucks because its a great som |
| <midfavila> | add emmc to it and id be cheesed |
| <midfavila> | even moreso if you replaced the sd slot with a CF one |
| <midfavila> | or had both |
| <sad_plan> | whats so good about emmc? ive always found it restricting |
| <sad_plan> | CF? |
| <midfavila> | not needing an sd card to boot off of |
| <midfavila> | compactflash |
| <sad_plan> | well, sure thats an advantage. |
| <sad_plan> | whats that? |
| <midfavila> | basically miniaturised IDE |
| <midfavila> | used in cameras a lot |
| <sad_plan> | hm |
| <midfavila> | old iPods used it for their 1.8" HDDs |
| <midfavila> | some industrial machines use it as primary storage instead of a full size disk |
| <sad_plan> | I see |
| <sad_plan> | got it |
| <sad_plan> | its smol |
| <midfavila> | smol, cheap, easy to support |
| <sad_plan> | and more reliable than sdcards aswell? |
| <midfavila> | fits with the retrofuture aesthetic |
| <midfavila> | less of a bitch to get in and out |
| <midfavila> | afaik yes |
| <sad_plan> | nice |
| <midfavila> | since most CFs are used in cameras etc |
| <sad_plan> | sdcards and usbsticks are horrendiously unreliable for storage initially |
| <midfavila> | im sure high performance SD cards are competitive but i honestly dont know |
| <sad_plan> | i think I remember those now that you mention it. i think my dad had one of them in a digital camera. unless someone else in the family had it |
Later messages |
---|