#kisslinux

Unofficial KISS Linux community channel | https://kisscommunity.bvnf.space | post logs or else | song of the day https://yewtu.be/watch?v=S81bNIK4MaE
Earlier messages
fitrhquit (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
angerisagiftquit (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
angerisagiftjoined
fitrhjoined
fitrhquit (Quit: fitrh)
<dilyn>how irritating of gnu https://bugs.gentoo.org/882787
<dilyn>it would be just like them to not issue a release JuSt UsE aUtOtOoLs
<jason123onirc>Even if there is a non updated glasnost tarball I could update the packages and then it should be fine
<dilyn>you say that like I didn't spend all week doing just that for my own two year old repo lol
<dilyn>updating after a long time of not can be tricky
<phoebos>speaking of which: https://codeberg.org/kiss-community/repo/releases/tag/24.12.18
<phoebos>please test!
<sewn>phoebos: whats the point of the KISS_HOOK if later on its just gonna be ignored
<phoebos>to reduce the size of the tarball
<sewn>i see
<sewn>wouldnt it make more sense to implement these things in upstream packages
<phoebos>no, it removes documentation
<phoebos>but I still want documentation in a package, it's just not necessary for the minimal chroot
<sewn>right
<sewn>also
<sewn>is there any benefit to using -Ddefault_library=both in meson packages or even in general?
<sewn>like distributing _both_ static and shared libraries
<sewn>when KISS is not even a statically linked distribution, so it makes no sense to keep static libraries, right?
<phoebos>i mean this is a topic of much debate
<phoebos>but for the tarball, no i suppose no need for the static libs
<dilyn>I'm always +1 for shipping static objs
<sewn>but whats the point
<sewn>go big or go home, why have static libraries to begin with
<sewn>if its just not gonna be used i think
<dilyn>I especially don't see a substantially good reason to not ship the <20MB of static libraries in at least the rootfs
<dilyn>I can *see* the argument for things in e.g. extra/
<sewn>static libraries on my system (191 pkgs) take up 110
<sewn>most of them dont have static libraries enabled
<sewn>110mb that is - woops
<dilyn>if we did package splitting I'd be all for it ;)
<sewn>or no package splitting and have repository splitting
<sewn>like a kiss where its all shared and a kiss where its all static
<sewn>oh hey sadplan is working on a static kiss :3
<sewn>i think
<midfavila>gm smoochers
<midfavila>do i see gifts from phoebos under the tree??? :O
<midfavila>i'll see if i can get something vaguely resembling an upstream tarball put together for riscv before christmas too ig
<midfavila>i'm picking it back up
<midfavila>took a lil' break this past week
<midfavila>going to try and get a proper gcc done up. that's been the main sticking point for months
<sewn>llvm my belove
<midfavila>running the rootfs under qemu and using a skarnet toolchain to bootstrap
<midfavila>llvm cringe
<midfavila>qbe based
<midfavila>i've said the internet words and therefore the matter is settled
Later messages